There are many things that can be done to keep pressure on anti-gun Democrats for this election cycle.
From Free Market Shooter: fmshooter.com
With midterm elections looming, Democrats seem hopeful about regaining seats in the House and recovering the majority in the Senate. However, critics have some solid doubts.
The 2018 Democratic Party in the United States of America is the “anti” party – anti-Trump, anti-business, anti-tax cuts… and anti-gun.
The other platform component is heavy-handed identity politics. They guilt supporters into buying the anti platform (and related ideologies) wholesale, squashing diverse opinion, debate, and individuality.
One can expect a party implosion come election time. However, those who would oust the current liberty-limiting politicians should seize the opportunity for action, and show that knowing the difference between fear-based policy and honest change is crucial.
The Midterm issue is gun control, and (bear with me here) men with guns are crucial to the defense of the Constitution and liberty. If more women had guns, especially stylish, business-type moms, and didn’t get shunned for defending their rights, they would be unstoppable against gun-grabbing agendas. It is unfathomable how any feminist could oppose gun rights, especially concealed carry, when guns are the great equalizer.
And this is relevant because the Democratic Party has painted a picture of the 2018 feminist, and they are some of the most anti-gun activists around. Smart women who own guns, not getting interrupted constantly on TV news, could obliterate identity politics. They could destroy the narrative that features only theSarahs Palin and Sanders, as sponsored by Cabela’s.
Since that shift is a distant dream in the political arena of shouting matches, men with guns will have to get the job done this election cycle. Here’s why men with guns can defy Democrats to protect liberty in November and beyond:
Read more: fmshooter.com
Please share and comment!
A U.S. gun lobby is fighting back against banks that have set lending restrictions on gun makers.
Citigroup and Bank of America issued new restrictions on gun retailers, and Bank of America said they would no longer lend money to companies that manufacture military style weapons for civilians.
As being reported by reuters.com
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. gun lobby is taking aim at “gun-hating” banks after Citigroup Inc and Bank of America said they would no longer provide certain banking services to gun-makers, according to industry lobbyists.
The attack by Gun Owners of America and the National Rifle Association (NRA) could imperil de-regulatory gains the banks had hoped to win from Republican lawmakers and regulators, many of whom are staunch defenders of the Second-Amendment right to bear arms, according to industry sources.
In March, Citigroup put restrictions on new retail business clients which sell guns to require their customers to pass background checks, following February’s Florida high school shooting that killed 17 people. Weeks later, Bank of America said it would no longer lend to companies that make military-style firearms for civilians.
Gun-control activists and Democrats praised the policy, urging other financial firms to follow suit. But gun owners and manufactures say it encroaches on Americans’ constitutional rights and they are fighting back.
Gun Owners of America (GOA), a Washington-based lobby group, has asked lawmakers to add a provision to a draft law rewriting bank rules that it says would prevent “gun-hating banks” from “discriminating” against firearms makers.
The gun lobbyists feel that the banks have a lot more to lose than to gain. The banks might be trying to please certain customers, but they are still discriminating against certain groups and businesses with these new rules and requirements. What happens when the gun owners and supporters of the second amendment start discriminating against the financial institutions?
How do you feel about this? Please share and leave your thoughts in the comments.
Dick’s Sporting Goods has reportedly lost out on their firearms business after several manufactures have severed ties with them do to their Anti-Gun Agenda.
As reported by foxnews.com
Several major gun manufacturers said they were severing ties with Dick’s Sporting Goods in response to the company's February announcement it would no longer sell assault-style weapons due to the deadly Parkland school shooting.
O.F. Mossberg & Sons Inc., the parent company of Mossberg guns, announced Wednesday they would no longer be doing business with the sports retailer. Mossberg & Sons ended its association with Dick's after Dick’s hired three Washington, D.C., lobbyists to push for gun control efforts, the National Review reported.
“It has come to our attention that Dick’s Sporting Goods recently hired lobbyists on Capitol Hill to promote additional gun control,” Mossberg & Sons CEO Iver Mossberg wrote in a press release. “Make no mistake, Mossberg is a staunch supporter of the U.S. Constitution and our Second Amendment rights, and we fully disagree with Dick’s Sporting Goods’ recent anti-Second Amendment actions.”
Kind of saw this one coming. You can’t really sell guns in your store but then advocate against guns. It’s a pretty poor business model don’t you think?
What are your thoughts on the situation with Dick’s? Please share and comment.